Attorney explains the difference between dog attack and dog bite.

Reading Time: < 1 minute

In California there is strict liability for when your dog attacks another person. Although Civil Code Section 3342 refers to a bite, case law has stated that it’s not necessary that the skin be broken in order for the statute to apply. Johnson v. McMahan (1998) 68 Cal.App. 4th 173, 176. So what does this all mean?

Attorney explains the difference between dog attack and dog bite.

Sometimes a large dog can jump on you and knock you down. A dog might not bite you but you still suffer injuries. We had a case where the dog caused our client to fall and she suffered an injury to her back and neck. We had another case where a dog attacked a person on a bike causing them to lose control and get a fracture. Even though there was no bite we were still able to sue under the dog bite statute. In other words just because there’s no bite, it doesn’t mean you don’t have a case. At a minimum you should speak to an attorney. Most attorneys like myself will do a free consultation.

Search

Blog Categories

Speak With One Of Our Experienced Lawyers

If you’re unsure what to do next after an accident, don’t wait. A quick conversation with our team can help clarify your situation and point you in the right direction.

Schedule A Free Consultation Now

Get Answers. Get Help.

Speak With an Attorney Today

If you’ve been injured or wronged due to someone else’s negligence, you don’t have to face this alone. Our team is here to listen, explain your options, and help you take the next step forward. If you’re not sure where to begin or have a question fill out the form below. If you are ready to get started you can schedule a free consultation now. There’s no obligation, and no fees unless we win.